IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1353-1361..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual differences in foraging decisions: information-gathering strategies or flexibility?

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa K. Arvidsson
  • Erik Matthysen

Abstract

Information on where to find food patches, their quality, and food variance can have implications for fitness and survival when a current food patch fails. Individuals have been found to vary in their response to changes in food availability, and this has been related to several personality traits in animals such as exploration behavior that measures activity in a novel environment. We examined if personality-related variation in reactions to food availability change could be explained by information-gathering strategies (IGSs), where individuals vary in investing in sampling known patches as a trade-off to seeking new patches. We also examined if these relationships can be explained by an alternative hypothesis where individuals are expected to express variation in behavioral flexibility (BF). The BF hypothesis predicted that individuals rely more on either internal/prior or external/current information. In addition to a standardized exploration behavior test, we designed a new 5-day-long experiment where individual reactions to changes in food availability were measured using wild great tits (Parus major). We found that slow exploring individuals sampled empty food patches more than fast exploring individuals, supporting the IGS hypothesis. We found no evidence for personality-related differences in feeder choice in response to changes in food availability, nor personality-related differences in flexibility in behavioral responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa K. Arvidsson & Erik Matthysen, 2016. "Individual differences in foraging decisions: information-gathering strategies or flexibility?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1353-1361.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1353-1361.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1353-1361.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.