IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1314-1319..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brood parasitism and proximity to human habitation

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Pape Møller
  • Mario Díaz
  • Wei Liang

Abstract

Humans provide safe refuge against many species such as birds of prey because such species keep a safe distance from humans. We hypothesized that many suitable host species for brood parasites similarly seek refuge in the proximity of humans to avoid parasitism. In 2 study areas sized 50 km2 in Denmark and France that consist of half urban habitats and half rural habitats, more than 77% of all birds were located within a distance of 100 m from the nearest inhabited house. Consistent with our hypothesis we found that brood parasitic common cuckoos Cuculus canorus kept a longer mean distance from human habitation than did numerous potential host species that generally nest close to human habitation. Thus, parasitism rate increased with increasing distance from human habitation. In an intraspecific study of the Oriental reed warbler Acrocephalus orientalis, we showed that parasitism rate increased with distance from the nearest human habitation, and individuals of this species were disproportionately aggregated near human habitation. Because numerous bird species have evolved close proximity to humans, we hypothesize that avoidance of brood parasitism is an important selective force having contributed to this pattern of microgeographic distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Pape Møller & Mario Díaz & Wei Liang, 2016. "Brood parasitism and proximity to human habitation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1314-1319.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1314-1319.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1314-1319.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.