IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i4p1206-1215..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A prison effect in a wild population: a scarcity of females induces homosexual behaviors in males

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Bonnet
  • Ana Golubović
  • Dragan Arsovski
  • Sonja Dorđević
  • Jean-Marie Ballouard
  • Bogoljub Sterijovski
  • Rastko Ajtić
  • Christophe Barbraud
  • Liljana Tomović

Abstract

The high frequency of same-sex sexual behaviors (SSB) in free-ranging animals is an evolutionary puzzle because fitness benefits are often unclear in an evolutionary context. Moreover, the physiological and genetic underpinnings of SSB remain unclear. We exploited an extraordinary natural experiment to examine the impact of environmental factors (local sex ratio [SR]) and testosterone (T) levels on SSB in a dense population of Hermann’s tortoises monitored for 7 years. Under the combination of high density and extremely skewed SR (~50 females, >1000 males), males courted and mounted other males more frequently than females. They even exhibited extravagant sexual behaviors, attempting to copulate with dead conspecifics, empty shells, and stones. T levels remained within the species’ normal range of variation. SSB was not observed in other populations where SR is not, or less skewed, and where density is lower. This study reports the first natural example of a "prison effect," whereby a high population density combined with female deprivation triggered SSB as a mere outlet of sexual stimulation. More generally, it supports the hypothesis that SSB can be a nonadaptive consequence of unusual proximate factors rather than reflecting physiological disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Bonnet & Ana Golubović & Dragan Arsovski & Sonja Dorđević & Jean-Marie Ballouard & Bogoljub Sterijovski & Rastko Ajtić & Christophe Barbraud & Liljana Tomović, 2016. "A prison effect in a wild population: a scarcity of females induces homosexual behaviors in males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 1206-1215.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1206-1215.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1206-1215.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.