IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i4p1198-1205..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nestling sex and plumage color predict food allocation by barn swallow parents

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Romano
  • Gaia Bazzi
  • Manuela Caprioli
  • Margherita Corti
  • Alessandra Costanzo
  • Diego Rubolini
  • Nicola Saino

Abstract

Despite parents are equally related to all of their progeny, they may differentially invest in offspring that provide the highest fitness return. Sons and daughters can differ in reproductive value, especially in species where fitness is predicted by the expression of sexually selected traits. In many birds, offspring plumage coloration functions as a honest signal of individual quality, thus allowing parents to differentially invest in offspring of either sex accordingly. Here, we tested whether parents allocate different amounts of food depending on plumage color of their male and female offspring. As a model, we used the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), a species where large among- and within-brood variation in ventral plumage color exists and male reproductive success varies according to ventral plumage coloration. We recorded the proportion of feedings obtained and body mass variation by dyads of same-sex and similar-sized nestlings subjected to either experimental darkening of their ventral plumage color or to a sham treatment. Plumage darkening enhanced food provisioning and body mass gain of males but not of females. Because darker ventral coloration is associated with larger reproductive success in male barn swallows, these results suggest that parents tune their effort toward more valuable male offspring that are likely to provide the greatest fitness returns. Our study thus suggests that parents are selected to differentially invest in offspring of either sex according to a trait expressed in early life, which is relevant to intrasexual competition for access to mates at sexual maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Romano & Gaia Bazzi & Manuela Caprioli & Margherita Corti & Alessandra Costanzo & Diego Rubolini & Nicola Saino, 2016. "Nestling sex and plumage color predict food allocation by barn swallow parents," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 1198-1205.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1198-1205.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosa Mary de Ayala & Nicola Saino & Anders Pape Møller & Cecilia Anselmi, 2007. "Mouth coloration of nestlings covaries with offspring quality and influences parental feeding behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 526-534.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirre J P Simons & Alan A Cohen & Simon Verhulst, 2012. "What Does Carotenoid-Dependent Coloration Tell? Plasma Carotenoid Level Signals Immunocompetence and Oxidative Stress State in Birds–A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-1, August.
    2. Juan José Soler & Ester Martínez-Renau & Manuel Azcárate-García & Cristina Ruiz-Castellano & José Martín & Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, 2022. "Made-up mouths with preen oil reveal genetic and phenotypic conditions of starling nestlings," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(3), pages 494-503.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1198-1205.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.