Author
Listed:
- Rubén Moreno-Opo
- Ana Trujillano
- Antoni Margalida
Abstract
The mechanisms that determine the evolutionary adaptations of scavengers to carrion exploitation have been well established. In contrast, little is known about coexistence during carrion exploitation based on behavioral traits and considering obligate and facultative species together. This study revisits the hypotheses of behavioral organization within the guild of necrophagous birds in light of the adaptive processes of specialization to carrion exploitation. We used a detailed dataset of observations from high-quality video recordings in the 2 regions with the most diverse and abundant populations of European avian scavengers. Active feeding time varied between species, with the obligate scavengers spending more time eating. The way that scavengers ate the food (i.e., on the ground or carrying away) diverged among species, with species with longer and more pointed beaks and a greater prehensile ability (of talons to grip things) carrying the remains away more often. We recognized the diversity and complementarity of strategies aimed at exploiting the same resource by different species and age classes. Scavenger species were clustered according to the relationship between the time active at the feeding site and the number of feeding pecks, leading to a decrease in competition for resource exploitation, as well as an occupation of specialized trophic niches. The study of active-consumption rates showed that eagles and vultures obtained most and a half, respectively, of their daily energetic requirements from each feeding event, reinforcing the important role of this relevant food source from ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, and conservation standpoints.
Suggested Citation
Rubén Moreno-Opo & Ana Trujillano & Antoni Margalida, 2016.
"Behavioral coexistence and feeding efficiency drive niche partitioning in European avian scavengers,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 1041-1052.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1041-1052.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:4:p:1041-1052.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.