IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i3p835-841..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs

Author

Listed:
  • Canchao Yang
  • Qiuli Huang
  • Longwu Wang
  • Aiwu Jiang
  • Bård G. Stokke
  • Frode Fossøy
  • Odd Helge Tunheim
  • Eivin Røskaft
  • Wei Liang
  • Anders P. Møller

Abstract

Lay Summary We studied the matching in egg appearance between plaintive cuckoos and their common tailorbird hosts, both of which have evolved blue and white eggs with brownish spots. Tailorbirds ejected all experimental eggs that differed from their own eggs but accepted almost all eggs belonging to their corresponding morphs. We provide evidence that plaintive cuckoos lay eggs randomly with respect to host egg appearance and that they do not selectively choose host nests to maximize egg matching and acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Canchao Yang & Qiuli Huang & Longwu Wang & Aiwu Jiang & Bård G. Stokke & Frode Fossøy & Odd Helge Tunheim & Eivin Røskaft & Wei Liang & Anders P. Møller, 2016. "Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(3), pages 835-841.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:3:p:835-841.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv226
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:3:p:835-841.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.