IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i2p538-544..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Herring perform stronger collective evasive reactions when previously exposed to killer whales calls

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Rieucau
  • Lise Doksæter Sivle
  • Nils Olav Handegard

Abstract

Schooling in fish is understood as a strategy reducing the risk of predation. Yet, it remains unsolved whether schooling fishes can change the structural properties of their collective in order to minimize risk and whether such adjustments promote efficient group-level responsiveness. We conducted a simulated-predator encounter experiment in a sea-cage on a large wild-caught Atlantic herring school (~60000 individuals). First, we tested whether herring schooling dynamics changed in response to vocalizations of killer whales (feeding calls), a main predator of herring in the wild. We also investigated if herring collective evasive reactions during simulated attacks varied after pre-exposure to killer whale vocalizations. Collective escape reactions (collective diving) were stronger when herring were previously exposed to killer whale vocalizations. However, herring did not modify their schooling dynamics (e.g., school density, school vertical distribution in the water column, fish swimming speed, or correlation strength between individuals, that measures how aligned the fish are as a function of distance) in response to the killer whale feeding calls alone. Overall, our results demonstrate that structural and dynamic changes at the school-level are not necessarily required for the execution of strong collective escape maneuvers, but risk awareness influences collective responsiveness and information transfer among schooling fish.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Rieucau & Lise Doksæter Sivle & Nils Olav Handegard, 2016. "Herring perform stronger collective evasive reactions when previously exposed to killer whales calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 538-544.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:538-544.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv186
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:538-544.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.