Author
Listed:
- Jorge S. Gutiérrez
- Theunis Piersma
Abstract
Food choice has profound implications for the relative intakes of water and salts, and thus for an animal’s physiological state. Discrimination behaviors with respect salt intake have been documented in a number of vertebrate species, but few studies have considered the ecological context in which they occur. Here, we report on the results of a 2-choice experiment designed to examine the influence of dietary salt content and freshwater availability in food discrimination behaviors in red knots Calidris canutus (Aves: Scolopacidae) that feed on mud snails Peringia ulvae (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae) whose body fluids have either relatively low (25‰) or high (42‰) salinity. Birds ate more and spent longer time foraging on low-salinity mud snails when their salt gland sizes—an indicator of excretory capacity—were relatively small and when they were deprived of freshwater. However, as they enlarged salt glands—following a prolonged exposure to salty diet without access to freshwater—and regained access to freshwater, their preference for low-salinity prey disappeared. Such a change of preference illustrates the context dependency of discrimination. As the birds were able to maintain salt–water balance—inferred from plasma sodium concentration—under all conditions, changes in salinity preferences may occur without measurable physiological signs of osmotic stress. Our results highlight the importance of ecological context for understanding foraging responses. We argue that areas with high salinities could act as refuges for euryhaline invertebrates and fish from top vertebrate predators.
Suggested Citation
Jorge S. Gutiérrez & Theunis Piersma, 2016.
"Ecological context determines the choice between prey of different salinities,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 530-537.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:530-537.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:530-537.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.