IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p68-74..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who cares? Experimental attention biases provide new insights into a mammalian sexual signal

Author

Listed:
  • Constance Dubuc
  • William L. Allen
  • Julie Cascio
  • D. Susie Lee
  • Dario Maestripieri
  • Megan Petersdorf
  • Sandra Winters
  • James P. Higham

Abstract

The effects of intrasexual and intersexual selection on male trait evolution can be difficult to disentangle, especially based on observational data. Male–male competition can limit an observer’s ability to identify the effect of female mate choice independently from sexual coercion. Here, we use an experimental approach to explore whether an ornament, the red facial skin exhibited by male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), might be involved in both female mate choice and male–male competition. We used a noninvasive experimental approach based on the looking time paradigm in a free-ranging setting, showing images of differently colored male faces to both adult females (N = 91) and males (N = 77), as well as to juveniles (N = 94) as a control. Results show that both adult females and males looked longer at dark red faces compared with pale pink ones. However, when considering the proportion of subjects that looked longer at dark red faces regardless of preference strength, only females showed a significant dark red bias. In contrast, juveniles did not show any preferences between stimuli, suggesting that the adult bias is not a consequence of the experimental design or related to a general sensory bias for red coloration among all age–sex classes. Collectively, these results support the role the ornament plays in female mate choice in this species and provide the first evidence that this ornament may play a role in male–male competition as well, despite a general lack of observational evidence for the latter effect to date.

Suggested Citation

  • Constance Dubuc & William L. Allen & Julie Cascio & D. Susie Lee & Dario Maestripieri & Megan Petersdorf & Sandra Winters & James P. Higham, 2016. "Who cares? Experimental attention biases provide new insights into a mammalian sexual signal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 68-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:68-74.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv117
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:68-74.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.