Author
Listed:
- Brent Stoffer
- George W. Uetz
Abstract
Females often prefer males with bright, showy, or large secondary sexual characters. However, social experience can result in variation in female preferences, with evidence of sexual imprinting in some taxa. In the brush-legged wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata, asynchrony of maturation provides a time period in which imprinting may occur. We tested whether adult females demonstrated plasticity in their visual preferences for male leg tuft size after experience with digitally courting males during their penultimate stage. Penultimate instar females were presented visual courtship signals from males with small, average, or large tufts; a mixture of tuft sizes; or no males at all. During Week 2 of adulthood, each female was presented playback of digital courting small- and/or large-tufted males in both no-choice and two-choice presentations. Adult female preferences varied significantly with prior experience. Females exposed to only large-tufted males or males with a mixture of tuft sizes demonstrated more receptivity displays to large-tufted males than small-tufted males. Females exposed to only small-tufted males demonstrated more receptivity displays toward small-tufted males than large-tufted males. Because results suggested the possibility of sexual imprinting, we tested for reversibility. A subset of females was retested for selectivity in two-choice trials, revealing a positive correlation between Week 2 and Week 5 female selectivity. Females previously exposed to small-tufted males, however, no longer maintained their preference for small-tufted males in Week 5. This study demonstrates the effects of an individual’s social environment on mating preferences, and the importance of age and timing when studying sexual imprinting.
Suggested Citation
Brent Stoffer & George W. Uetz, 2016.
"Social experience affects female mate preferences for a visual trait in a wolf spider,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 252-261.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:252-261.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:252-261.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.