IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p204-210..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nest environment modulates begging behavior of a generalist brood parasite

Author

Listed:
  • Diego T. Tuero
  • Ros Gloag
  • Juan C. Reboreda

Abstract

In young birds, the intensity of the begging signal varies according to the chick’s internal condition (i.e., hunger or nutritional state) but may be additionally modulated by the external conditions experienced in the nest (e.g., nestmate competition or feeding success). Flexibility of begging in response to nest environment should be especially beneficial for the chicks of generalist brood parasites, which encounter diverse brood conditions depending on the host nest in which they are reared. We investigated variability in the begging behavior of an extreme generalist brood parasite, the shiny cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis). We compared visual and vocal begging variables of cowbird young of 5 days of age reared in nests of 2 common hosts, one smaller (house wren, Troglodytes aedon) and one larger (chalk-browed mockingbird, Mimus saturninus) than the parasite. Cowbird chicks were standardized for short-term hunger prior to recording and were similar in mass/condition in each host, but nevertheless begged more intensely in mockingbird than house wren nests, as indicated by increased stretching of the neck, lower latency to beg, increased time spent begging per bout and greater call rate. These results are consistent with young cowbirds adjusting their begging intensity based on the intrabrood competition of a given host, independent of need, an adaptability that likely contributes to their success as parasites utilizing diverse host species.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego T. Tuero & Ros Gloag & Juan C. Reboreda, 2016. "Nest environment modulates begging behavior of a generalist brood parasite," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 204-210.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:204-210.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:204-210.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.