Author
Listed:
- Andreas Sutter
- Leigh W. Simmons
- Anna K. Lindholm
- Renée C. Firman
Abstract
Polyandry is widespread across animal taxa and subjects males to intense postcopulatory sexual selection which favors adaptations that enhance a male’s paternity success, either by decreasing the risk of sperm competition and/or by increasing the competitiveness of the ejaculate. Copulatory plugs deposited by males are thought to have evolved in the context of sperm competition. However, experimental studies that assess the function of copulatory plugs remain scarce. Moreover, most studies have used unnatural manipulations, such as ablating plug-producing male glands or interrupting copulations. Here, we investigated whether repeated ejaculation affects plug size in a mammalian model species, the house mouse. When males experience short periods of sexual rest we found that plug size decreased over repeated ejaculations so that time since last ejaculation can be applied as an approximation for plug size. We induced natural variation in plug size arising from variation in male sexual restedness and investigated the behavior and paternity success of rival males. Male behavior in the offensive mating role (second) was influenced, albeit not significantly, by the sexual restedness of the first male to mate, and therefore the size of his plug. However, second males sired a significantly greater proportion of embryos when competing against a male that had recently mated compared with a male that had not. This supports a potential role of the plug in promoting a male’s competitive fertilization success when remating occurs, which could be mediated both by delaying female remating and by ensuring efficient sperm transport through the female reproductive tract.
Suggested Citation
Andreas Sutter & Leigh W. Simmons & Anna K. Lindholm & Renée C. Firman, 2016.
"Function of copulatory plugs in house mice: mating behavior and paternity outcomes of rival males,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 185-195.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:185-195.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:185-195.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.