Author
Listed:
- Kendra N. Smyth
- Christine M. Drea
Abstract
Within animal societies, demographic and social factors, as well as the different reproductive efforts of group members, may influence individual patterns of reproductive success and parasitism. In mammals, such relationships have been studied primarily in male-dominant species. To better understand these linkages in other social systems, we studied a female-dominant cooperative breeder, the meerkat (Suricata suricatta). This species is characterized by intense intrasexual competition and extreme reproductive skew in both sexes. Within adults, we examined heterogeneities in infection by 6 species of endoparasites in relation to host factors (e.g., weight, age, social status, sex, and group size). We explored potential trade-offs between reproduction and parasitism in dominant and subordinate animals of both sexes. Whereas weight and age were predictive of a few parasite taxa, social status or sex predicted parasite species richness and patterns of infection for the majority of parasites examined. Moreover, a significant interaction between sex and status for 2 nematode taxa revealed that dominant females were the most at risk of infection. Lastly, a positive relationship between group size and parasitism was evident in females only. In sum, compared with subordinates, dominant meerkats may experience increased exposure to directly transmitted parasites. Coupled with hormone-mediated immunosuppression, the increased susceptibility of dominant females may reflect energy allocation for preferentially maintaining dominance and breeding status over parasite defense. In species in which female intrasexual competition is intense, this trade-off between reproduction and health may be more pronounced in females than in males.
Suggested Citation
Kendra N. Smyth & Christine M. Drea, 2016.
"Patterns of parasitism in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: a cost of dominance for females,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 148-157.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:148-157.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:148-157.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.