IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i6p1569-1576..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation in nest relocation of harvester ants is affected by population density and food abundance

Author

Listed:
  • Noa Pinter-Wollman
  • Mark J.F. Brown

Abstract

Movement patterns of animals throughout their habitat depend on the associated costs and benefits, which vary among species and potentially among populations. Here, we compare the nest relocation patterns of seed-harvesting ant colonies between 2 populations in northern and southern California, and over time. Understanding the causes and consequences of nest relocation by harvester ants is particularly important because these ants shape the ecological communities in which they reside. We show that nest relocation is both variable between the 2 populations and consistent within a population over more than a decade. Relocation frequency and distance was greater at the site with lower population density, shorter period of vegetation growth, and slightly higher humidity. Thus, when the benefits associated with finding new resources through nest relocation are high and the costs of desiccation or encountering other colonies during relocation are low, nest relocation becomes a preferable behavioral strategy. These findings suggest that populations adjust their movement patterns based on the ecological conditions they face. Consequently, our findings may explain site-specific ecological dynamics that emerge from the behavioral rules of an ecosystem engineer.

Suggested Citation

  • Noa Pinter-Wollman & Mark J.F. Brown, 2015. "Variation in nest relocation of harvester ants is affected by population density and food abundance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1569-1576.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:6:p:1569-1576.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:6:p:1569-1576.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.