IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i5p1262-1263..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are within-cycle variations in women’s sexual interests mere by-products? A comment on Havliček et al

Author

Listed:
  • Steven W. Gangestad
  • Nicholas M. Grebe

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven W. Gangestad & Nicholas M. Grebe, 2015. "Are within-cycle variations in women’s sexual interests mere by-products? A comment on Havliček et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1262-1263.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:1262-1263.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Dixson, 2015. "Human sexuality and the menstrual cycle: comment on Havliček et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1261-1261.
    2. James R. Roney & Aaron W. Lukaszewski & Zachary L. Simmons & Adar B. Eisenbruch & Rachel L. Grillot, 2015. "A between-women account of cycle-phase shifts is probably wrong: comment on Havliček et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1264-1265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Havliček & Kelly D. Cobey & Louise Barrett & Kateřina Klapilová & S. Craig Roberts, 2015. "Greater precision, not parsimony, is the key to testing the peri-ovulation spandrel hypothesis: a response to comments on Havliček et al. 2015," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1265-1267.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:1262-1263.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.