IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i4p1164-1169..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Habitat alteration influences male signalling effort in the Australian desert goby

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Michelangeli
  • Ulla Tuomainen
  • Ulrika Candolin
  • Bob B.M. Wong

Abstract

Male sexual signals provide vital information about the quality of the signaller and can have important consequences for male reproductive success. Habitat changes, however, are expected to affect male sexual displays. An important question, therefore, is to determine if and how such sexual displays are adjusted to changes in the signalling environment, especially in highly dynamic systems or those affected by human-induced environmental change. Desert, rivers, and springs are among the world’s most threatened habitats. Many of these fragile water bodies are being overwhelmed by invasive weeds and excess primary productivity as an indirect result of human agricultural demand for freshwater. Here, we investigated the effects of altered habitat on the courtship effort of male desert gobies, Chlamydogobius eremius. Male courtship effort was observed in an environment that was either dominated by bulrush (Typha sp.) or modified by increased algal turbidity (Scendesmus sp.). We found that males that were exposed to an environment dominated by bulrush spent more time courting in these environments compared with environments that were unaltered. In contrast, males that were exposed to environments modified by increased algal turbidity not only took longer to initiate courtship but also spent less time courting females. These results suggest that different habitat alterations can have important consequences for the reproductive behavior of affected organisms and, ultimately, the direction of sexual selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Michelangeli & Ulla Tuomainen & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B.M. Wong, 2015. "Habitat alteration influences male signalling effort in the Australian desert goby," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1164-1169.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1164-1169.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1164-1169.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.