IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i4p1060-1070..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral plasticity in nest residency compensates for inbreeding depression in male prairie voles

Author

Listed:
  • Kristen E. Lucia-Simmons
  • Brian Keane

Abstract

Inbreeding negatively affects offspring production and survival in many species, but the fitness characteristics of adult inbred individuals are rarely evaluated. We examined the impact of inbreeding on the fitness of adult prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) under ecologically relevant conditions by releasing equal numbers of inbred and noninbred adults into 0.1 ha small mammal enclosures. The founding adult male and female prairie voles showed strong inbreeding depression that persisted into the third generation, despite the absence of additional inbreeding events. However, we found evidence that inbred males could ameliorate the negative inbreeding effects through a behavioral strategy: living at the nest with the mother of their offspring. Although they themselves produced fewer offspring, inbred males pursuing this reproductive strategy had offspring with increased reproductive success, resulting in equal numbers of grand-offspring produced by inbred and noninbred males. Our data demonstrate that a single generation of inbreeding can have lasting effects, but behavioral compensation for inbreeding effects is also possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristen E. Lucia-Simmons & Brian Keane, 2015. "Behavioral plasticity in nest residency compensates for inbreeding depression in male prairie voles," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1060-1070.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1060-1070.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1060-1070.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.