IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i3p877-884..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking lab activity with growth and movement in the wild: explaining pace-of-life in a trout stream

Author

Listed:
  • Libor Závorka
  • David Aldvén
  • Joacim Näslund
  • Johan Höjesjö
  • Jörgen I. Johnsson

Abstract

Theory suggests that consistent individual differences in activity are linked to life history where high activity is associated with rapid growth, high dispersal tendency, and low survival (the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis). We addressed this influential hypothesis by combining behavioral studies with fine-scale positional scoring in nature, estimating how individual movement strategies in brown trout (Salmo trutta) associate with fitness correlates (growth and survival) in the wild. Initial dispersal in the wild was positively related to the laboratory activity. Moreover, the growth of individuals with high laboratory activity decreased with increasing home range size, whereas the growth of individuals with lower laboratory activity increased slightly with increasing home range size. Survival in the wild was not associated with laboratory activity. Our results do not support the original pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis. As an alternative explanation, we suggest that the growth of individuals adopting a high-activity strategy is more sensitive to variation in resource abundance (indicated by home range size) than the fitness individuals adopting a more passive strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Libor Závorka & David Aldvén & Joacim Näslund & Johan Höjesjö & Jörgen I. Johnsson, 2015. "Linking lab activity with growth and movement in the wild: explaining pace-of-life in a trout stream," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 877-884.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:877-884.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:877-884.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.