Author
Listed:
- Lauren M. Pintor
- James E. Byers
Abstract
Non-native species can serve as a prey resource for native predators. Yet because there is often no shared evolutionary history between the predator and prey, individuals within a predator population may vary greatly in their willingness to consume a recently introduced, yet profitable prey. Here, we measured individual variation in diet, behavior, and demographic traits of the native predatory mud crab, Panopeus herbstii, and evaluated how these traits influenced an individual’s consumption of a recently introduced, non-native crab, Petrolisthes armatus, using both simultaneous and no-choice assays. These same individual predatory mud crabs were also assayed to quantify their antipredator reaction and exploratory behavior. Results indicated significant variation in the diets of individual predators with 45% specializing on native mussels, 14% specializing on non-native Petrolisthes, and the remainder eating multiple prey species. When given a choice of alternative prey, individual Panopeus predators that consumed a larger proportion of Petrolisthes were female, smaller, and more likely to flee in response to predators. When given no choice of alternative prey, Petrolisthes was consumed more frequently by Panopeus that were female and less exploratory. We suggest that individuals that more readily consume non-native Petrolisthes may be attempting to reduce competition with conspecifics that are larger, more aggressive, exploratory, and male. Our results suggest that at least initially following invasion, adoption of a non-native prey species into the diet of a native predator may not occur universally within the population. Such nonuniform predation pressure could contribute to the non-native prey’s release from natural enemies.
Suggested Citation
Lauren M. Pintor & James E. Byers, 2015.
"Individual variation in predator behavior and demographics affects consumption of non-native prey,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 797-804.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:797-804.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:797-804.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.