Author
Listed:
- Alexander V. Georgiev
- Michael P. Muehlenbein
- Sean P. Prall
- Melissa Emery Thompson
- Dario Maestripieri
Abstract
In social mammals, condition and health are important determinants of the ability of males to achieve high dominance rank. Measures of individual condition are also predicted to affect male fitness via female preference for high-quality mates. We examined intermale variation in phenotypic quality (immune function and oxidative stress) in relation to male dominance status and mating success in a species with prominent female choice and a lack of male–female sexual coercion, the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). We quantified immunity via 2 functional assays of innate immune response (bacteria killing assay and hemolytic complement assay) and measured oxidative stress via a lipid peroxidation assay in 15 adult males from 1 social group of macaques on Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico. We then observed these males throughout the mating season to test the prediction that males in better condition achieved higher mating success. Males with more robust innate immune response and lower oxidative damage mated with a greater number of potentially fertile females. Male dominance rank, however, also correlated with our measures of quality. Higher-ranking males had more robust functional innate immune response and lower levels of oxidative damage. After accounting for rank, male quality was no longer correlated with mating success. These results demonstrate a potentially important role of male phenotypic quality in the mating system of a long-lived, group-living primate. What are the exact behavioral mechanisms via which sexual selection may operate on traits related to immunocompetence and resistance to oxidative damage in this species, however, remains an open question.
Suggested Citation
Alexander V. Georgiev & Michael P. Muehlenbein & Sean P. Prall & Melissa Emery Thompson & Dario Maestripieri, 2015.
"Male quality, dominance rank, and mating success in free-ranging rhesus macaques,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 763-772.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:763-772.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:763-772.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.