IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p632-638..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterospecific nonalarm vocalizations enhance risk assessment in common mynas

Author

Listed:
  • Lilah Hubbard
  • William King
  • Anmy Vu
  • Daniel T. Blumstein

Abstract

Animals rely on their acoustic environments to gain information regarding predator threats and social opportunities. However, because individuals have limited attention, focusing on a particular aspect of their acoustic environment may affect their ability to allocate attention elsewhere. Some previous studies support the distracted prey hypothesis, which suggests that animals may be distracted by any stimuli, inhibiting their ability to detect approaching predators. In this study, we further tested the distracted prey hypothesis by employing playback experiments to simultaneously examine the relative effects of 3 types of noises—anthropogenic sounds, conspecific nonalarm sounds, and heterospecific nonalarm sounds—as distractors for common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). We used 3 different stimuli: motorcycle noise, social common myna calls, and social red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer) calls. We first examined myna response to each stimulus by measuring time allocation to various behaviors immediately before and during broadcasting the 3 playbacks. We then studied how these stimuli affected their antipredator behavior by measuring the distance at which they fled from an approaching predator (flight initiation distance). We found that mynas responded to all 3 stimuli by delaying their return to relaxed behavior following the playbacks compared with a silent treatment. In contrast to the distracted prey hypothesis, we found that mynas fled at greater distances when hearing red-vented bulbul social vocalizations than during our silent treatment. This suggests that rather than distracting, some social vocalizations may enhance prey vigilance and lead to earlier flight.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilah Hubbard & William King & Anmy Vu & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2015. "Heterospecific nonalarm vocalizations enhance risk assessment in common mynas," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 632-638.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:632-638.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eben Goodale & Sarath W. Kotagama, 2008. "Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 887-894.
    2. Daniel T. Blumstein, 2010. "Flush early and avoid the rush: a general rule of antipredator behavior?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 440-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahar, Neeraj & Dobriyal, Pariva & Badola, Ruchi & Hussain, Syed Ainul, 2024. "Tourism on the roof of the world: Socio-ecological impacts of tourism on the Indian Trans-Himalaya," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Peter Mikula & Oldřich Tomášek & Dušan Romportl & Timothy K. Aikins & Jorge E. Avendaño & Bukola D. A. Braimoh-Azaki & Adams Chaskda & Will Cresswell & Susan J. Cunningham & Svein Dale & Gabriela R. F, 2023. "Bird tolerance to humans in open tropical ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Dana M. Williams & Diogo S.M. Samia & William E. Cooper & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2014. "The flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis holds after accounting for spontaneous behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1136-1147.
    4. Anders Pape Møller & László Zsolt Garamszegi, 2012. "Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 843-853.
    5. Ari E. Martínez & Rosana T. Zenil, 2012. "Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 544-550.
    6. Diogo S M Samia & Daniel T Blumstein, 2014. "Phi Index: A New Metric to Test the Flush Early and Avoid the Rush Hypothesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Daniela Campobello & Maurizio Sarà & James F. Hare, 2012. "Under my wing: lesser kestrels and jackdaws derive reciprocal benefits in mixed-species colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 425-433.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:632-638.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.