IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p578-586..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shelter availability alters diel activity and space use in a stream fish

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Larranaga
  • Stefán Ó. Steingrímsson

Abstract

Shelters are a key component of animal population ecology, as they provide protection from predators and promote visual isolation among competitors. From a behavioral perspective, how shelter availability affects the way individuals allocate their activity in space has been extensively documented. However, how shelters affect the distribution of activity in time (i.e., diel activity) has been less studied in natural conditions. Here, we report results from a field study that used stream enclosures with either high or low shelter availability and stream-dwelling juvenile Arctic charr as a model species. We collected repeated measurements of individual activity 8 times a day (every 3h) for six 24-h periods during a span of 9 days. In shelter-limited enclosures, fish were more active, became diurnal, and were active over a wider span of time each day, compared with fish with access to abundant shelters. In addition, fish were more aggregated and attacked prey over shorter distances and at lower rate when shelters were limited. Body mass did not affect individual activity rates, but smaller individuals extended their activity over longer periods, possibly as a result of interference competition, and were more isolated. Growth rates were similar across treatments and were positively correlated with individual activity rates and the average distance to the nearest competitor. However, additional nonmeasured effects on fitness may occur, such as increased predation risk associated with daytime feeding and extended activity in shelter-limited conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Larranaga & Stefán Ó. Steingrímsson, 2015. "Shelter availability alters diel activity and space use in a stream fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 578-586.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:578-586.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru234
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:578-586.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.