Author
Listed:
- Carly J. Wilson
- Joseph L. Tomkins
Abstract
Females often mate with multiple males even when a single mating is sufficient to fertilize their eggs. Remating can lead to direct and indirect benefits for females, but these benefits trade-off against the potential costs associated with polyandry. There is a growing understanding that not all males are equal in their ability to deliver sperm to the site of fertilization. Such differences can arise both from environmental (e.g., mating history) and intrinsic (genetic) sources of variation. Most studies that investigate female fitness control male mating history to overcome such effects, but this control may bias interpretations of the benefits of polyandry. Here, we tried to avoid overestimating the benefits of polyandry that might accrue from mating repeatedly with virgin males. To do this, we quantified 6 components of fitness in female bruchid beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, that were mated between 1 and 4 times to males with unknown mating histories, either in isolation or with rival males present. As copulation number increased, fecundity, offspring production, and egg-to-adult survival declined. In contrast to these short-term costs, the probability that a female remained completely infertile was highest at 1 copulation, and geometric mean fitness peaked after 3 copulations. Pericopulatory harassment by males did not affect female productivity. There was a significant interaction between this harassment and copulation number on longevity such that harassed females mating 2 or 3 times, and females mating twice in isolation, died soonest. Our results suggest that females may be selected to mate multiply despite short-term costs to fitness.
Suggested Citation
Carly J. Wilson & Joseph L. Tomkins, 2015.
"Female Callosobruchus maculatus can maximize long-term fitness through polyandry,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 502-509.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:502-509.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:502-509.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.