IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p493-501..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Within-group vocal differentiation of individuals in the cooperatively breeding apostlebird

Author

Listed:
  • Miyako H. Warrington
  • Paul G. McDonald
  • Simon C. Griffith

Abstract

The ability of animals to discriminate between individuals or groups of individuals (e.g., kin or nonkin) is an important component of many hypotheses proposed to explain the evolution of cooperation and benefits of group living. Previous studies in mammalian systems have demonstrated the use of vocal cues in individual recognition and discrimination. However, there are few such studies in birds. Previous avian studies have largely examined discrimination between different categories of individuals (e.g., mate vs. nonmate, offspring vs. non-offspring) while discrimination between individuals of the same category remain largely unexplored. Previous work has demonstrated that the contact calls of free-living apostlebirds (Struthidea cinerea) are individually distinct. Here, we demonstrate that apostlebirds can differentiate between the calls of other individuals of the same social group using vocal cues alone. These findings are biologically relevant as apostlebirds live in complex fission–fusion societies where social groups vary in size, sex ratio, number of breeders, and composition of related and unrelated members.

Suggested Citation

  • Miyako H. Warrington & Paul G. McDonald & Simon C. Griffith, 2015. "Within-group vocal differentiation of individuals in the cooperatively breeding apostlebird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 493-501.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:493-501.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:493-501.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.