IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p406-415..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deficiency in egg rejection in a host species as a response to the absence of brood parasitism

Author

Listed:
  • Canchao Yang
  • Longwu Wang
  • Shun-Jen Cheng
  • Yu-Cheng Hsu
  • Bård G. Stokke
  • Eivin Røskaft
  • Arne Moksnes
  • Wei Liang
  • Anders Pape Møller

Abstract

Different populations of a host species subject to variable patterns of selection due to cuckoo parasitism provide an optimal situation for studying natural selection and coevolution in action. We compared egg appearance and egg-rejection behavior of 2 common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts, the ashy-throated parrotbill (Paradoxornis alphonsianus) and the vinous-throated parrotbill (Paradoxornis webbianus) between mainland China and Taiwan population that have been segregated for 2–3 million years. Avian visual modeling showed that the mainland host population under strong selection from brood parasitism has evolved polymorphic eggs, while the island host population released from brood parasitism has maintained the original monomorphic egg phenotype. Furthermore, experiments indicated that under such long historical segregation, egg rejection in the island population decayed dramatically in the absence of cuckoo parasitism. This study provides strong evidence that egg-rejection ability can be dramatically deficient in host populations without brood parasitism compared to parasitized ones. The results further enhance our understanding of changes in egg-rejection behavior in birds without the selection pressure of brood parasitism for an extended period of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Canchao Yang & Longwu Wang & Shun-Jen Cheng & Yu-Cheng Hsu & Bård G. Stokke & Eivin Røskaft & Arne Moksnes & Wei Liang & Anders Pape Møller, 2015. "Deficiency in egg rejection in a host species as a response to the absence of brood parasitism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 406-415.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:406-415.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:406-415.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.