Author
Listed:
- Andrew J. Mongue
- Maaz Z. Ahmed
- Michelle V. Tsai
- Jacobus C. de Roode
Abstract
Although many studies have examined precopulatory female choice, it is increasingly clear that females may choose paternity after copulation with multiple males. Such cryptic female choice may be more common in species where females have limited precopulatory choice. We tested for cryptic female choice in the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), which has a male-coerced mating dynamic. We used a mating design consisting of female pairs mated to the same 2 males. Using microsatellite markers, we determined P2, the proportion of offspring fathered by the second male. In 3 treatments, we varied the relatedness of females and males and calculated P2 repeatability of the 2 females in a replicate. Assuming cryptic female choice, we predicted more repeatable P2 values for genetically related female pairs than unrelated pairs. Additionally, we predicted that females should favor paternity by unrelated males over brothers to avoid potential inbreeding depression. Our results revealed no P2 repeatability differences between treatments and no differences in paternity of brothers and unrelated males. These results suggest monarchs do not employ cryptic female choice and do not avoid inbreeding postmating. Moreover, we did not find significant sperm precedence; neither first nor second male obtained higher paternity. However, our results suggested that interactions between male and female lineages may slightly affect offspring paternity, suggesting genetic compatibilities may affect sexual selection in this species. We also found a bimodal paternity distribution, confirming that monarchs follow the lepidopteran pattern of paternity, despite precopulatory behavioral differences.
Suggested Citation
Andrew J. Mongue & Maaz Z. Ahmed & Michelle V. Tsai & Jacobus C. de Roode, 2015.
"Testing for cryptic female choice in monarch butterflies,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 386-395.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:386-395.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:386-395.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.