IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p340-349..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's choice Populations, pools, and peccaries: simulating the impact of ecosystem engineers on rainforest frogs

Author

Listed:
  • Max Ringler
  • Walter Hödl
  • Eva Ringler

Abstract

"Ecosystem engineering" describes habitat alteration by an organism that affects another organism; such nontrophic interactions between organisms are a current focus in ecological research. Our study quantifies the actual impact an ecosystem engineer can have on another species by using a previously identified model system—peccaries and rainforest frogs. In a 4-year experiment, we simulated the impact of peccaries on a population of Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae) by installing an array of artificial pools to mimic a forest patch modified by peccaries. The data were analyzed using a gradual before-after control-impact (gBACI) model. Following the supplementation, population size almost doubled as a result of increased autochthonous recruitment driven by a higher per-capita reproduction of males and a higher proportion of reproducing females. The effect was evenly distributed across the population. The differential response of males and females reflects the reproductive behavior of A. femoralis, as only the males use the aquatic sites for tadpole deposition. Our study shows that management and conservation must consider nontrophic relationships and that human "ecosystem engineering" can play a vital role in efforts against the "global amphibian decline."

Suggested Citation

  • Max Ringler & Walter Hödl & Eva Ringler, 2015. "Editor's choice Populations, pools, and peccaries: simulating the impact of ecosystem engineers on rainforest frogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 340-349.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:340-349.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru243
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:340-349.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.