IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i1p200-206..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male size predicts extrapair paternity in a socially monogamous bird with extreme sexual size dimorphism

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah J. Wells
  • Weihong Ji
  • James Dale
  • Beatrix Jones
  • Dianne Gleeson

Abstract

Extrapair paternity (EPP) is purported to be an important contributor to the evolution of plumage dimorphism, and yet relatively few studies have demonstrated that EPP creates selection pressures on male traits. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is instead typically assumed to have evolved in association with polygyny rather than EPP. Yet, the New Zealand tui, Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae, is a socially monogamous passerine exhibiting extreme SSD and sexual plumage dimorphism. Here, we examine whether EPP has contributed to the evolution of SSD in body size and ornament size in the tui. We discovered one of the highest rates of EPP currently known, with extrapair young occurring in 72% of broods and accounting for 57% of all offspring. Both male body size and ornament size were strongly correlated to EPP, with within-pair paternity success positively related to both traits. Male ornament size, but not body size, was a significant predictor of a male’s success at siring extrapair offspring. Although these patterns may have arisen through either male–male competition or female choice, it is likely that these 2 mechanisms are not mutually exclusive in tui. This study provides evidence that EPP can both create selection pressures on male traits, and contribute to the evolution of SSD.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah J. Wells & Weihong Ji & James Dale & Beatrix Jones & Dianne Gleeson, 2015. "Male size predicts extrapair paternity in a socially monogamous bird with extreme sexual size dimorphism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 200-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:200-206.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Cockburn & Anastasia H. Dalziell & Caroline J. Blackmore & Michael C. Double & Hanna Kokko & Helen L. Osmond & Nadeena R. Beck & Megan L. Head & Konstans Wells, 2009. "Superb fairy-wren males aggregate into hidden leks to solicit extragroup fertilizations before dawn," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 501-510.
    2. Sarah Guindre-Parker & H. Grant Gilchrist & Sarah Baldo & Stephanie M. Doucet & Oliver P. Love, 2013. "Multiple achromatic plumage ornaments signal to multiple receivers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 672-682.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel P Caro & Léo Pierre & Matthieu Bergès & Raldi Bakker & Claire Doutrelant & Francesco Bonadonna, 2021. "Mutual mate preferences and assortative mating in relation to a carotenoid-based color trait in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1171-1182.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naomi E Langmore, 2023. "Female song can be over-looked in even the most intensively studied songbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 160-161.
    2. Çağlar Akçay & William A. Searcy & S. Elizabeth Campbell & Veronica A. Reed & Christopher N. Templeton & Kayla M. Hardwick & Michael D. Beecher, 2012. "Who initiates extrapair mating in song sparrows?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 44-50.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:200-206.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.