IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i1p115-120..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eliciting an immune response reduces sprint speed in a lizard

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Javier Zamora-Camacho
  • Senda Reguera
  • María Virtudes Rubiño-Hispán
  • Gregorio Moreno-Rueda

Abstract

Predators and pathogens can diminish organisms’ fitness, and consequently natural selection favors antipredatory and antiparasitic strategies. Nevertheless, as both kinds of strategies consume resources, animals cannot maximize investment in both strategies simultaneously, which should lead to trade-offs between the two. Accordingly, we hypothesize that there is a trade-off between sprint capacity and immune response, which are among the most important antipredatory and antiparasitic strategies, respectively, of many animals. Consequently, we predict that animals eliciting an immune response should reduce their sprint capacity. We experimentally tested this prediction in the lizard Psammodromus algirus. A group of lizards was inoculated with the antigen LPS (lipopolysaccharide of the cell wall of Escherichia coli), which activates the immune system, whereas the other group (control) was inoculated with phosphate buffer, which has no physiological effect. Before and after the inoculations, we filmed sprint capacity of lizards, estimating the maximal sprint speed. Males were faster than females before the activation of their immune system. Nonetheless, males’ sprint speed diminished after the inoculation of LPS, whereas females’ did not. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis of a trade-off between sprint speed and immune response in males. Consequently, male lizards combating a pathogen may suffer either higher risk of predation, or reduced fitness if they avoid this risk by spending more time in shelter.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Javier Zamora-Camacho & Senda Reguera & María Virtudes Rubiño-Hispán & Gregorio Moreno-Rueda, 2015. "Eliciting an immune response reduces sprint speed in a lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 115-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:115-120.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Navarro & F. de Lope & A. Marzal & A. P. Møller, 2004. "Predation risk, host immune response, and parasitism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 629-635, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Mikula & Oldřich Tomášek & Dušan Romportl & Timothy K. Aikins & Jorge E. Avendaño & Bukola D. A. Braimoh-Azaki & Adams Chaskda & Will Cresswell & Susan J. Cunningham & Svein Dale & Gabriela R. F, 2023. "Bird tolerance to humans in open tropical ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. L. García-Longoria & L. Z. Garamszegi & A. P. Møller, 2014. "Host escape behavior and blood parasite infections in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 890-900.
    3. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Magdalena Zagalska-Neubauer & David Canal & Gábor Markó & Eszter Szász & Sándor Zsebők & Eszter Szöllősi & Gábor Herczeg & János Török, 2015. "Malaria parasites, immune challenge, MHC variability, and predator avoidance in a passerine bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1292-1302.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:115-120.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.