Author
Listed:
- Karen M. Cogliati
- Allison F. Mistakidis
- Julie R. Marentette
- Adrienne Lau
- Benjamin M. Bolker
- Bryan D. Neff
- Sigal Balshine
Abstract
The description of a species’ mating patterns is often based on observations from a single exemplar population; however, environmental variation can lead to variation in mating patterns and to differences in the strength of sexual selection among populations. In this study, we explored how resource distribution across a species’ range affects competition and the strength of sexual selection in a northern and southern population of plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus), a species with 2 male reproductive tactics. Male plainfin midshipman can be guarders that compete for nest sites and court females, or sneakers that attempt to steal fertilizations from the guarder males during spawning. Males from the north population grow larger, suggesting that there might be more competition among males in the north. However, we found that the variance in body size and in nest availability were similar between populations, suggesting instead a similar degree of male-male competition. We found no significant population differences in reproductive success (north: 517±50 eggs/nest ± SE; south: 412±68 eggs/nest ± SE), paternity (north: 52%; south: 58% for the guarding male), or tactic frequencies (north: 88% guarders; south: 91% guarders). There was a marginally steeper Bateman gradient in the south population but no difference at 8 other measures of the strength of sexual selection between the 2 populations. Thus, despite a wide geographic distance, our results show remarkable conservation of mating patterns between the north and south populations of this benthic toadfish.
Suggested Citation
Karen M. Cogliati & Allison F. Mistakidis & Julie R. Marentette & Adrienne Lau & Benjamin M. Bolker & Bryan D. Neff & Sigal Balshine, 2014.
"Comparing population level sexual selection in a species with alternative reproductive tactics,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1524-1533.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1524-1533.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1524-1533.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.