Author
Listed:
- Sarah Leclaire
- Pauline Pierret
- Marion Chatelain
- Julien Gasparini
Abstract
Feathers are inhabited by numerous bacteria, some of them being able to degrade feathers, and thus potentially alter thermoregulation and visual communication. To limit the negative effects of feather bacteria on fitness, birds have therefore evolved antimicrobial defense mechanisms, including preening feathers with secretions of the preen gland. However, whether feather bacteria can alter feather condition and color signaling in vivo, and thus whether birds adjust their investment in preening according to feather bacterial load, has barely been investigated. Here, we experimentally decreased and increased feather bacterial load on captive feral pigeons Columba livia and investigated the effects on plumage characteristics and investment in preening. We found that birds of both sexes had a plumage in higher condition and invested less in preen secretion quantity and preening behavior when feather bacterial load was lower. It suggests that preen secretions may be used by pigeons to limit feather degradation by bacteria, but as they are probably costly to produce, their quantity is adjusted depending on feather bacteria load. Birds with lower bacteria load on feathers had brighter iridescent neck feathers, suggesting that feather bacteria may play an important role in the evolution of the signaling function of iridescent color in pigeons. Altogether, our study provides the first experimental evidence for in vivo effects of feather bacteria on plumage degradation and coloration and suggests that preening is an inducible antibacterial defense.
Suggested Citation
Sarah Leclaire & Pauline Pierret & Marion Chatelain & Julien Gasparini, 2014.
"Feather bacterial load affects plumage condition, iridescent color, and investment in preening in pigeons,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1192-1198.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1192-1198.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1192-1198.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.