IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i5p1157-1163..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex-biased juvenile dispersal is adaptive but does not create genetic structure in island lizards

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Calsbeek
  • M.C. Duryea
  • Elizabeth Parker
  • Robert M. Cox

Abstract

Dispersal is a potentially risky behavior that has several important implications for demography. Dispersal may be measured directly through behavioral observations or indirectly using genetic analyses. The direct approach is accurate but labor-intensive, whereas the indirect approach depends on population subdivision to infer dispersal events. Here, we combine field studies of behavior and natural selection in an island lizard (Anolis sagrei) to provide direct estimates of sex-specific dispersal and then compare these estimates to measures of population subdivision at both nuclear (biparental inheritance) and mitochondrial (uniparental inheritance) genetic markers. Juvenile males dispersed 4 times further than juvenile females. Natural selection acted against long-distance dispersal in females, but we measured no such selection on dispersal distance in males. Despite strong evidence for sex-biased dispersal accompanied by selection, we detected no population genetic signature of dispersal at either nuclear or mitochondrial loci. In closed populations, such as those occurring on small islands, repeated dispersal events may have important demographic consequences and yet produce no population genetic signature owing to continuous admixture of genotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Calsbeek & M.C. Duryea & Elizabeth Parker & Robert M. Cox, 2014. "Sex-biased juvenile dispersal is adaptive but does not create genetic structure in island lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1157-1163.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1157-1163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1157-1163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.