Author
Listed:
- Morgan David
- Marion Salignon
- Marie-Jeanne Perrot-Minnot
Abstract
Recent ecological and evolutionary research emphasizes the importance of adaptive trait integration. For instance, antipredator defenses are built up of several morphological and behavioral components in many species, yet their functional relationships are still poorly documented. Using field-collected freshwater crustaceans Gammarus fossarum in a within-subject design, we investigated the flexibility and consistency of refuge use, photophobia, and exploration behavior as well as their associations, quantified both when predation risk was absent or artificially simulated. In agreement with the "threat-sensitivity" hypothesis, both refuge use and photophobia increased under predation risk, whereas exploration behavior did not vary. For all behaviors, individuals exhibited low but significant consistency between risk treatments. However, intraindividual variability did not vary with weight or between sexes. Finally, a positive relationship between photophobia and refuge use was observed only under predation risk in females, whereas it was found in both risk treatments in males. Our findings demonstrate that predation risk may promote behavioral flexibility and behavioral correlations, or syndromes, in wild populations, and call for an integrative study of antipredator mechanisms where the evolution of each dimension has to be examined in combination with all others. Additional phenotypic traits should be included in future studies to better characterize the multidimensionality of antipredator defense and the functional relationships among traits. The survival consequence of behavioral correlations between risk-sensitive traits also remains to be estimated in mortality selection experiments.
Suggested Citation
Morgan David & Marion Salignon & Marie-Jeanne Perrot-Minnot, 2014.
"Shaping the antipredator strategy: flexibility, consistency, and behavioral correlations under varying predation threat,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1148-1156.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1148-1156.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1148-1156.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.