Author
Listed:
- Sonia Kleindorfer
- Herbert Hoi
- Christine Evans
- Katharina Mahr
- Jeremy Robertson
- Mark E. Hauber
- Diane Colombelli-Négrel
Abstract
There is growing empirical support for teaching in nonhuman animals. To unravel the evolutionary dynamics of teaching, we need to understand its costs and benefits. In superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus), females teach their embryos by calling to them: embryos learn a vocal password, and hatchlings incorporate the learned vocal password into their begging calls to solicit parental feeding. The more a female teaches (higher call rate), the better the embryos learn (greater call similarity), leading to more food provisioning by parents. Given these direct benefits, we would expect all female fairy-wrens to call often to maximize embryonic learning in their genetic progeny, yet they do not. Teaching the password carries a severe cost: nest predation was higher at both natural and artificial nests that had more incubation calls. At artificial nests, predation was 8-fold higher for high incubation call rate (30 calls per hour) and 5-fold higher for low incubation call rate (15 calls per hour) compared with nests without any incubation calls. At natural nests, nests that were depredated during incubation had higher incubation call rate (18.3 calls per hour) than nests that survived (11.4 calls per hour). Mother fairy-wrens must trade-off the costs of calling and the benefits of learning to optimize fitness benefits of teaching.
Suggested Citation
Sonia Kleindorfer & Herbert Hoi & Christine Evans & Katharina Mahr & Jeremy Robertson & Mark E. Hauber & Diane Colombelli-Négrel, 2014.
"The cost of teaching embryos in superb fairy-wrens,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1131-1135.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1131-1135.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1131-1135.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.