Author
Listed:
- Corlett W. Wood
- Hannah E. Marti
- Edmund D. Brodie III
Abstract
The fitness consequences of extreme competitive interactions such as cannibalism are often governed by the environment because the costs and benefits of such behaviors depend on the ecological and social context of the participants. However, most studies of context-dependent cannibalism are conducted under extreme circumstances or examine only a single environmental context, conditions that are unlikely to exist in natural populations. In this study, we tested the effect of multiple environmental contexts on the frequency of cannibalism in forked fungus beetle larvae (Bolitotherus cornutus), which develop in 1 of 3 different fungus species. We paired larvae in laboratory trials and measured the effect of 1) ecological context (the 3 fungi) and 2) the relatedness of the paired larvae on the frequency of cannibalism. We found a strong effect of ecological context on cannibalism: larvae in 1 fungus cannibalized nearly twice as often as larvae in the other two. We did not detect an effect of relatedness on cannibalism in the 1 species of fungus in which trials were conducted. Cannibalism conferred benefits in the form of accelerated growth rates in all measured traits relative to noncannibals. However, contrary to most studies, cannibalism was most common in the highest quality fungus, contradicting the hypothesis that cannibalism occurs in poor environments to compensate for resource deficiencies. We discuss alternative mechanisms that may drive the ecological context dependence of cannibalism in B. cornutus and emphasize the importance of studying context-dependent behavior in naturally occurring environments.
Suggested Citation
Corlett W. Wood & Hannah E. Marti & Edmund D. Brodie III, 2014.
"The effect of ecological context and relatedness on larval cannibalism in a fungus-associated beetle,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 951-959.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:951-959.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:951-959.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.