IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i4p827-833..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex ratio does not influence sex change despite its effect on reproductive success

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Kappus
  • Peggy Fong

Abstract

The sex ratio of adults in a population affects the reproductive value of being either a male or female and thus may be a cue for sex change in sequentially hermaphroditic species. We examined the effect of the sex ratio on reproduction and sex change of the reef fish, Lythrypnus dalli, and predicted that the sex ratio would influence the reproductive success for a given body size and thus the probability of sex change. We varied adult sex ratios on artificial patch reefs, monitored egg production over 20 days, and examined rates of sex change. We found no evidence that sex ratio influenced the size at which individuals change sex despite its influence on relative reproductive success. The sex ratio influenced the average reproductive success of males but not females, with males having both a higher probability of mating and higher per capita reproductive success on strongly female-biased reefs. However, females did not capitalize by changing sex to male more frequently. Female per capita reproductive success did not vary with changes in the sex ratio or female density, suggesting that females were not limited by male or resource availability. Male to female sex change was rare, suggesting that, although physiologically possible, this behavior may be uncommon in natural populations. Overall, our results indicate that the sex ratio may not be a good predictor of the reproductive value of sex change for a given individual and that body size alone may provide sufficient information regarding reproductive potential for a given sex.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Kappus & Peggy Fong, 2014. "Sex ratio does not influence sex change despite its effect on reproductive success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 827-833.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:827-833.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:827-833.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.