IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i4p813-818..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prior experience affects allocation to current reproduction in a burying beetle

Author

Listed:
  • Eric J. Billman
  • J. Curtis Creighton
  • Mark C. Belk

Abstract

The cost of reproduction hypothesis predicts that the level of reproductive investment to current reproduction is constrained by an individual’s future reproductive potential or residual reproductive value. Therefore, age, or differences between young and old individuals in residual reproductive value, is expected to influence reproductive investment. However, recent theoretical work suggests that residual reproductive value is also influenced by an individual’s state or condition which may in part be determined by prior reproductive experience. We evaluated the reproductive investment of same-aged female burying beetles (Nicrophorus orbicollis) to determine how prior reproductive experience affects current reproduction. Consistent with previous research, females reproducing on low-quality carcasses allocated more to future reproduction by producing smaller offspring and gaining more mass than females on high-quality carcasses. When prior experience was manipulated, females that initially reproduced on a low-quality resource exhibited an accentuated response to a high-quality carcass by producing significantly larger broods of offspring compared with control females reproducing on high-quality carcasses. Conversely, females that initially reproduced on a high-quality carcass and were subsequently presented a low-quality carcass exhibited a decrease in offspring size and an increase in female mass change, indicative of a switch in allocation from current to future reproduction. The change in carcass quality resulted either in terminal investment or reproductive restraint, dependent on prior experience. Our results combined with those of previous papers demonstrate that the level of reproductive investment in burying beetles is influenced by both age and prior reproductive experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric J. Billman & J. Curtis Creighton & Mark C. Belk, 2014. "Prior experience affects allocation to current reproduction in a burying beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 813-818.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:813-818.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca E Gray & Jon Richardson & Tom Ratz & Per T Smiseth, 2018. "No evidence for parent–offspring competition in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1142-1149.
    2. Hilary Cope & Edward R Ivimey-Cook & Jacob Moorad, 2022. "Triparental ageing in a laboratory population of an insect with maternal care [Male age alone predicts paternity success under sperm competition when effects of age and past mating effort are exper," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1123-1132.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:813-818.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.