IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i4p762-772..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of parental roles in provisioning birds: diet determines role asymmetry in raptors

Author

Listed:
  • Geir A. Sonerud
  • Ronny Steen
  • Vidar Selås
  • Ole M. Aanonsen
  • Gunn-Henny Aasen
  • Kristine L. Fagerland
  • Annette Fosså
  • Lena Kristiansen
  • Line M. Løw
  • Mads E. Rønning
  • Sarah K. Skouen
  • Espen Asakskogen
  • Hilde M. Johansen
  • Jon T. Johnsen
  • Lise I. Karlsen
  • Gunnar C. Nyhus
  • Line T. Røed
  • Kristin Skar
  • Bjørn-Arild Sveen
  • Reidar Tveiten
  • Tore Slagsvold

Abstract

Raptors are known for asymmetric parental roles, with the female brooding and feeding offspring, and the male providing food, usually assisted by the female from the latter part of the rearing period. Yet, the evolution of this role asymmetry is poorly understood. From filming prey delivery and handling in 61 nests of 9 raptor species, we show that the female role is related to prey size and prey type. Within species, nestlings were less likely to ingest larger prey unassisted, independent of increasing ability of unassisted feeding with increasing age. Feeding time increased with prey size and was longer for avian than for mammalian prey of the same size when nestlings fed unassisted. Across species, the female partitioned prey and fed offspring for a longer portion of the rearing period as prey size increased and as the diet contained more birds. Providing for the family selects for small body size; hence, extended female confinement as sedentary food processor for offspring would leave greater potential for differential selection on male and female body size. This may explain the female-biased size dimorphism among raptors, which becomes larger as diet changes from insects via reptiles and mammals to birds and as relative prey size increases. Symmetric parental roles and no female-biased size dimorphism would be expected in birds providing insects or other food that nestlings swallow without maternal assistance. Prey type and prey size would be important also for sexual conflicts and evolution of polygamy and mate desertion in birds providing for offspring.

Suggested Citation

  • Geir A. Sonerud & Ronny Steen & Vidar Selås & Ole M. Aanonsen & Gunn-Henny Aasen & Kristine L. Fagerland & Annette Fosså & Lena Kristiansen & Line M. Løw & Mads E. Rønning & Sarah K. Skouen & Espen As, 2014. "Evolution of parental roles in provisioning birds: diet determines role asymmetry in raptors," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 762-772.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:762-772.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrik Byholm & Heta Rousi & Inkeri Sole, 2011. "Parental care in nesting hawks: breeding experience and food availability influence the outcome," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 609-615.
    2. Pablo Vergara & Juan A. Fargallo & Jesus Martínez-Padilla, 2010. "Reaching independence: food supply, parent quality, and offspring phenotypic characters in kestrels," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 507-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Muriel & Miguel Ferrer & Javier Balbontín & Laura Cabrera & Cecilia P. Calabuig, 2015. "Disentangling the effect of parental care, food supply, and offspring decisions on the duration of the postfledging period," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1587-1596.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:762-772.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.