IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i4p754-761..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal care provides antifungal protection to eggs in the European earwig

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Boos
  • Joël Meunier
  • Samuel Pichon
  • Mathias Kölliker

Abstract

Many insects raise their offspring on organic substrates or in the soil where microorganisms are abundant. Microbes may pose a serious threat to offspring development and survival by either decomposing food resources or directly infecting the offspring. Selection to cope with these effects may favor social defenses, for example, through forms of parental care that can limit or eliminate these threats to offspring fitness. In this study, we experimentally tested if maternal egg attendance in the European earwig Forficula auricularia has a function as a social defense against mold infection of eggs by manipulating exposure of eggs to mold spores and the presence of the mother in a fully factorial design. Furthermore, we investigated the potential roles of egg grooming behavior and maternal transfer of chemicals as underlying mechanisms. As predicted, the beneficial effect of egg attendance on hatching success was significantly enhanced when eggs were exposed to the mold. Females significantly increased their egg grooming duration in response to mold exposure of her eggs, and the quantity of chemicals (identified as hydrocarbons) was maintained among attended eggs but decreased substantially among unattended eggs. Maternal transfer of chemicals was confirmed in extractions of glass beads that were mingled into attended or unattended clutches. This study shows that maternal egg attendance in the European earwig has a social defense function protecting offspring against mold infection. The maternal egg grooming behavior seems to be key for this effect, probably through both the mechanical removal of spores and the continued application of chemical substances on the egg surface.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Boos & Joël Meunier & Samuel Pichon & Mathias Kölliker, 2014. "Maternal care provides antifungal protection to eggs in the European earwig," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 754-761.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:754-761.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew G. Zink, 2003. "Quantifying the costs and benefits of parental care in female treehoppers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 687-693, September.
    2. Ralph Dobler & Mathias Kölliker, 2010. "Kin-selected siblicide and cannibalism in the European earwig," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 257-263.
    3. S.C. Cotter & R.M. Kilner, 2010. "Personal immunity versus social immunity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 663-668.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James D.J. Gilbert, 2014. "Thrips domiciles protect larvae from desiccation in an arid environment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1338-1346.
    2. Florent Masson & Rachael Louise Brown & Joel Vizueta & Thea Irvine & Zijun Xiong & Jonathan Romiguier & Nathalie Stroeymeyt, 2024. "Pathogen-specific social immunity is associated with erosion of individual immune function in an ant," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:754-761.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.