Author
Listed:
- Andrew J. Laughlin
- Daniel R. Sheldon
- David W. Winkler
- Caz M. Taylor
Abstract
Communal roosting is a taxonomically widespread phenomenon, with considerable variation in patterns of roost dynamics. Some organisms roost together in different locations each night (or day), whereas others roost in traditional locations each night, sometimes switching between roosts in the roost network. The behaviors that drive roost-site selection and the resulting patterns are not well understood. We created an individual-based model that simulates the daily aggregation of organisms into communal roosts. In the model, individuals move according to a movement rule integrating 2 independently adjustable behavioral drivers: roost fidelity, which leads individuals back toward their previous nights’ roost, and conspecific attraction, which leads individuals to congregate toward nearest conspecific neighbors. The model predicts that variable levels of aggregation will emerge under different combinations of these drivers, ranging from no aggregation to complete aggregation of individuals into their previous roosts. We tested to see which combination of drivers best predicts patterns of roost use in our study system of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) in southeastern Louisiana in fall. Using Doppler weather radar data, we show that Tree Swallow roost sites remain consistent from night to night, and the birds return to one of several traditional roosts. Using radio telemetry, we show that individuals switch between these traditional roosts at minimum 22% of the time. Our results suggest that the formation of large communal roosts in Tree Swallows is driven by a combination of moderate conspecific attraction and strong, but not perfect, roost fidelity.
Suggested Citation
Andrew J. Laughlin & Daniel R. Sheldon & David W. Winkler & Caz M. Taylor, 2014.
"Behavioral drivers of communal roosting in a songbird: a combined theoretical and empirical approach,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 734-743.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:734-743.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:734-743.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.