IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p612-626..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver M. Selz
  • Michele E.R. Pierotti
  • Martine E. Maan
  • Corinne Schmid
  • Ole Seehausen

Abstract

A critical step for speciation in the face of gene flow is the origination of reproductive isolation. The evolution of assortative mating greatly facilitates this process. Assortative mating can be mediated by one or multiple cues across an array of sensory modalities. We here explore possible cues that may underlie female mate choice in a sympatric species pair of cichlid fish from Lake Victoria, Pundamilia pundamilia and Pundamilia nyererei. Previous studies identified species-specific female preferences for male coloration, but effects of other cues could not be ruled out. Therefore, we assessed female choice in a series of experiments in which we manipulated visual (color) and chemical cues. We show that the visibility of differences in nuptial hue (i.e., either blue or red) between males of the 2 species is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating by female mate choice. Such assortment mediated by a single cue may evolve relatively quickly, but could make reproductive isolation vulnerable to environmental changes. These findings confirm the important role of female mate choice for male nuptial hue in promoting the explosive speciation of African haplochromine cichlids.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver M. Selz & Michele E.R. Pierotti & Martine E. Maan & Corinne Schmid & Ole Seehausen, 2014. "Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 612-626.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:612-626.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:612-626.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.