Author
Listed:
- Sophie C. Bell
- Ian P.F. Owens
- Alexa M. Lord
Abstract
Sex allocation theory predicts that females will invest more in offspring of the sex that offers a higher fitness potential. Male offspring should be favored where direct genetic benefits from the father or indirect benefits from the parents or environment are likely to result in higher than average quality offspring. In birds, sex allocation has previously been linked to paternal quality and sexual attractiveness, but the potential importance of breeding territory quality has been largely overlooked. Using a wild population of a territorial bird species, the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), we show that variation in sex ratio is associated with paternal quality, but that the relationship hinges on the quality of the breeding territory. Among broods in high-quality territories, there is a positive association between primary sex ratio and male mate condition, which is not found among broods in low-quality territories. In turn, we find that paternal quality as opposed to maternal quality is associated with chick recruitment and that the condition of the chick is predicted by an interaction of parental and territory quality, reflecting the trend in primary sex ratio bias observed in our system. These results suggest that sex allocation is influenced not only by variation in the quality of the father but also by differences between territories in the resources available for breeding, which in turn suggests an interaction between genetic and environmental effects.
Suggested Citation
Sophie C. Bell & Ian P.F. Owens & Alexa M. Lord, 2014.
"Quality of breeding territory mediates the influence of paternal quality on sex ratio bias in a free-living bird population,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 352-358.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:352-358.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:352-358.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.