IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i2p262-270..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's choice The biparental care hypothesis for the evolution of monogamy: experimental evidence in an amphibian

Author

Listed:
  • James Tumulty
  • Victor Morales
  • Kyle Summers

Abstract

Selection for biparental care is considered to be an important factor favoring the evolution of monogamy if the value of exclusive cooperation in care for mutual offspring outweighs the benefits of polygamy for either sex. Support for this hypothesis has come primarily through parent removal experiments in avian taxa. We tested this hypothesis in the first known example of a socially and genetically monogamous amphibian, the mimic poison frog (Ranitomeya imitator). Biparental care in R. imitator is characterized by egg attendance, tadpole transport, and feeding of tadpoles with unfertilized trophic eggs. Using a male removal experiment, we found lower tadpole growth and lower survival for widowed females compared with control families. We demonstrate that in addition to egg attendance and tadpole transport, male parental care is critical for offspring survival throughout larval development. Previous research has shown the importance of female trophic egg provisioning of tadpoles in R. imitator. This, coupled with the results of the present study demonstrating the adaptive value of male care, supports the hypothesis that selection for biparental care has driven the evolution of monogamy in an amphibian.

Suggested Citation

  • James Tumulty & Victor Morales & Kyle Summers, 2014. "Editor's choice The biparental care hypothesis for the evolution of monogamy: experimental evidence in an amphibian," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 262-270.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:262-270.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Summers, 2016. "Expanding investigations of manipulation via maternal effects: a comment on Paquet and Smiseth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(3), pages 696-696.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:262-270.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.