Author
Listed:
- Thotsapol Chaianunporn
- Thomas Hovestadt
Abstract
In some systems, organisms form or join groups mediated by certain recognition cues. However, it is predicted that variability in such cues cannot be maintained as positive, frequency-dependent selection favors the dominant cue (Crozier’s paradox). We utilize a simple analytical model of 2 groups as well as computer simulations to find conditions where the coexistence (polymorphism) of 2 distinct recognition cues is maintained. We assume a species that forms reproductive groups and the adoption of a newborn individual into a group depends on that individual’s genotype (recognition cue) in relation to the group’s profile. We investigate the role of 2 factors affecting the level of isolation between groups, namely group tolerance toward deviant genotypes and dispersal between groups. Results from the analytical model show that high tolerance or high dispersal lead to the global fixation of a single genotype, whereas low group tolerance and low dispersal promote the globally stable coexistence of different genotypes. Interestingly, coexistence can only be global, with a different genotype dominating each group, or local, with 2 genotypes coexisting in one group, depending on the degree of tolerance and dispersal. Local coexistence, however, does not persist, when dispersal is allowed to evolve. In this case, low dispersal evolves, which stabilizes global coexistence but reduces local coexistence. If we expand the number of groups and assume spatially limited dispersal, global coexistence becomes a more likely outcome even under conditions where it was impossible in the 2-group system.
Suggested Citation
Thotsapol Chaianunporn & Thomas Hovestadt, 2014.
"Group tolerance, dispersal evolution, and the maintenance of polymorphism in recognition cues,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 191-199.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:191-199.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:191-199.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.