Author
Listed:
- Malika Ihle
- Wolfgang Forstmeier
Abstract
Mating between close relatives nearly always leads to inbreeding depression, which should promote the evolution of inbreeding avoidance mechanisms, especially in sexually monogamous species. The zebra finch, a predominantly monogamous species, has been shown to suffer strongly from inbreeding depression, and this species has been used repeatedly in studies of inbreeding avoidance. However, no conclusive evidence for such avoidance has emerged. Here, we summarize the previous research in a small meta-analysis showing that zebra finches appear to mate randomly with regard to relatedness (odds ratio for full-sibling mating = 0.96). Nevertheless, we notice that kin recognition by direct familiarization might have been prevented in all the previous studies because siblings had always been experimentally separated before puberty and only reunited during adulthood. Recognizing individuals across different life stages may be cognitively demanding; therefore, in this species, it may require that siblings stay in contact throughout development. We conducted an experiment where birds were given the choice between a full sibling that stayed with them without interruption from hatching until adulthood and an unrelated bird familiar from independence (35 days of age) to adulthood. In contrast to all earlier studies, we found a significant avoidance of inbreeding (odds ratio = 0.50). Although other mechanisms cannot be excluded, we suggest that zebra finches avoid inbreeding only if birds can keep track of their kin, and we discuss implications for the design of follow-up studies.
Suggested Citation
Malika Ihle & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2013.
"Revisiting the evidence for inbreeding avoidance in zebra finches,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1356-1362.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1356-1362.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1356-1362.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.