IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i6p1306-1311..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social conflict in ant larvae: egg cannibalism occurs mainly in males and larvae prefer alien eggs

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Schultner
  • Patrizia d’Ettorre
  • Heikki Helanterä

Abstract

In social organisms, cooperation is widespread. However, social groups also provide excellent opportunities for individuals to exploit the cooperative efforts of others, thus creating conflict. Social conflict is particularly common in ant societies but although much is known about conflicts between adult individuals, the selfish interests of developing offspring have been largely neglected. One taxonomically widespread way for offspring to engage in competition is through egg cannibalism. Here, we show that larvae of the ant Formica aquilonia compete by eating eggs, which increases their survival. Cannibalism behavior differs strongly between sexes, and males cannibalize 3 times as often as females. This points to sex-dependent benefits from cannibalism, for males possibly through removal of future competitors for mating opportunities. Larvae also preferentially eat eggs of distinct origin and odor profile, suggesting that they can detect and react to chemical cues. Thus, similar to adult ants, larvae possess the power to adjust their behavior to available information. We conclude that exploring the behavior of developing individuals can give new insight into social conflict in ants and social animals in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Schultner & Patrizia d’Ettorre & Heikki Helanterä, 2013. "Social conflict in ant larvae: egg cannibalism occurs mainly in males and larvae prefer alien eggs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1306-1311.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1306-1311.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1306-1311.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.