IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1177-1184..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prey escorting behavior and possible convergent evolution of foraging recruitment mechanisms in an invasive ant

Author

Listed:
  • Tomer J. Czaczkes
  • Ayrton Vollet-Neto
  • Francis L.W. Ratnieks

Abstract

The longhorn crazy ant Paratrechina longicornis is a pest ant species with worldwide distribution. It tends honeydew-producing Hemiptera to obtain carbohydrates and is also an effective predator and scavenger. What strategies does P. longicornis use to aid in hunting and scavenging? Our results show that as well as long-term recruitment to stable food sources, this species uses specialized short-term recruitment pheromones to recruit nest mates to assist in the exploitation of large food items. By mass, 88% of externally carried food was retrieved cooperatively. Recruitment to large items is via a pheromone trail laid by the discovering ant. This trail is initially followed with few errors by naive recruits (82% correct choices at a T-bifurcation) but decays very rapidly (within 6min). We also show that food-discovering ants can recruit nearby nest mates to a large food item without returning to the nest. These properties of the recruitment system are strikingly similar to 2 unrelated ant species, which also specialize in cooperative retrieval of large food items, suggesting convergent evolution. Lastly, we describe a novel "escort" behavior in which additional workers accompany a transported item but do not necessarily assist in carrying it. Both local recruitment and escorting are much more pronounced (3 and 4 times greater, respectively) when handling live prey. When an "escort" is present, live prey presented to the ants is 50% more likely to be captured and is captured 4 times sooner and 50% closer to the release point.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomer J. Czaczkes & Ayrton Vollet-Neto & Francis L.W. Ratnieks, 2013. "Prey escorting behavior and possible convergent evolution of foraging recruitment mechanisms in an invasive ant," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1177-1184.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1177-1184.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1177-1184.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.