IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1128-1137..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple mating in a lizard increases fecundity but provides no evidence for genetic benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel W.A. Noble
  • J. Scott Keogh
  • Martin J. Whiting

Abstract

Multiple paternity is taxonomically widespread, yet the relative role of direct and indirect (genetic) fitness benefits in explaining the evolution of multiple mating is a topic of intense debate. We test whether female Eastern Water Skinks (Eulamprus quoyii) gain direct (fecundity) and/or indirect genetic (increased offspring fitness) benefits through multiple mating. We maintained 216 (108 males and 108 females) E. quoyii in 6 large outdoor enclosures for a single breeding season before bringing gravid females into the lab to give birth. We classified female clutches as being singly or multiply sired using 6 polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci. To test whether females gain genetic benefits, we measured 5 fitness traits on offspring over their first active season and compared these traits between single paternity and multiple paternity clutches. Contrary to predictions from genetic benefits models, offspring from multiple paternity and single paternity clutches did not differ significantly in snout–vent length, mass, growth rate, sprint speed, or endurance. Although multiple paternity and single paternity females did not differ significantly in body size, condition, or mass, multiple paternity females invested more heavily in reproduction when body size, mass, and condition were controlled, producing significantly more offspring compared with single paternity females. We suggest that polyandry in E. quoyii possibly evolved as a mechanism to ensure fertilization of ova, similar to what has been reported in some other taxa.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel W.A. Noble & J. Scott Keogh & Martin J. Whiting, 2013. "Multiple mating in a lizard increases fecundity but provides no evidence for genetic benefits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1128-1137.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1128-1137.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E V(Ginny) Greenway & Jennifer A Hamel & Christine W Miller, 2021. "Exploring the effects of extreme polyandry on estimates of sexual selection and reproductive success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1055-1063.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1128-1137.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.