IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p853-858..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When a male changes his ways: sex differences in feeding behavior in the pied flycatcher

Author

Listed:
  • Raivo Mänd
  • Elo Rasmann
  • Marko Mägi

Abstract

Although sexual dimorphism is a well-known phenomenon, several aspects of it remain unresolved. For example, it is not clear how environmental conditions influence sexual dimorphism, especially in behavioral traits. In a study of pied flycatchers, we tested whether there are differences in the composition of food brought to young by the different parents and whether such sex differences are dependent on the hunger level of nestlings. We found that in normal feeding conditions, female parents provisioned nestlings with relatively more food collected from the tree canopy (caterpillars), whereas males brought more food caught in flight (adult lepidopterans). To imitate a temporary worsening of environmental conditions, we experimentally increased the hunger level of nestlings. Male parents responded to this manipulation by changing their foraging behavior such that the sex difference in provisioning behavior diminished. Possible explanations for the observed sex differences are discussed. This result is in accordance with the general pattern previously found for sex differences in animal size and certain other traits—namely that sex differences tend to diminish in harsh environmental conditions. It is possible that a decrease in sex differences in harsh conditions represents a more general pattern than previously assumed.

Suggested Citation

  • Raivo Mänd & Elo Rasmann & Marko Mägi, 2013. "When a male changes his ways: sex differences in feeding behavior in the pied flycatcher," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 853-858.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:853-858.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:853-858.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.