IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i3p779-787..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony J. Lee
  • Shelli L. Dubbs
  • Ashleigh J. Kelly
  • William von Hippel
  • Robert C. Brooks
  • Brendan P. Zietsch

Abstract

Avoiding disease and acquiring resources have been recurrent challenges throughout human evolution. These abilities are particularly relevant to mate preferences, as pathogens and resources can both be transferred between mates and to mutual offspring. Based on 689 participants’ attractiveness ratings of manipulated online dating profiles, we tested whether pathogen and resource concerns predicted revealed mate preferences for facial attractiveness, facial sexual dimorphism, and perceived intelligence and also whether these different trait preferences were intercorrelated. Supporting our predictions, pathogen concerns positively predicted men and women’s preferences for facial attractiveness and men’s preference for facial femininity, whereas women’s resource concerns negatively predicted their preference for facial masculinity. Unexpectedly, neither pathogen nor resource concerns predicted preference for greater perceived intelligence. Further, preference for perceived intelligence was negatively correlated with preference for facial attractiveness, which was positively correlated with preference for facial sexual dimorphism. These findings suggest that facial attributes are used in mate assessment as cues of health and likelihood of resource provisioning, whereas intelligence may primarily be used as a cue of other, distinct qualities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony J. Lee & Shelli L. Dubbs & Ashleigh J. Kelly & William von Hippel & Robert C. Brooks & Brendan P. Zietsch, 2013. "Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 779-787.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:779-787.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars199
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barnaby JW Dixson & Anthony C Little & Henry GW Dixson & Robert C Brooks, 2017. "Do prevailing environmental factors influence human preferences for facial morphology?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1217-1227.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:779-787.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.